When was antisocial personality disorder discovered

The distinction between psychopathy and ASPD is of considerable significance to the mental health and criminal justice systems.

Unfortunately, it is a distinction that is often blurred, not only in the minds of many clinicians but in the latest edition of DSM-IV. Traditionally, affective and interpersonal traits such as egocentricity, deceit, shallow affect, manipulativeness, selfishness, and lack of empathy, guilt or remorse, have played a central role in the conceptualization and diagnosis of psychopathy Cleckley; Hare ; in press ; Widiger and Corbitt.

Psychopathy-renamed antisocial personality disorder- was now defined by persistent violations of social norms, including lying, stealing, truancy, inconsistent work behavior and traffic arrests.

Among the reasons given for this dramatic shift away from the use of clinical inferences were that personality traits are difficult to measure reliably, and that it is easier to agree on the behaviors that typify a disorder than on the reasons why they occur. The result was a diagnostic category with good reliability but dubious validity, a category that lacked congruence with other, well-established conceptions of psychopathy.

This "construct drift" was not intentional but rather the unforeseen result of reliance on a fixed set of behavioral indicators that simply did not provide adequate coverage of the construct they were designed to measure. Much of the debate concerned the absence of personality traits in the diagnosis of ASPD, an omission that allowed antisocial individuals with completely different personalities, attitudes and motivations to share the same diagnosis.

At the same time, there was mounting evidence that the criteria for ASPD defined a disorder that was more artifactual than "real" Livesley and Schroeder. Coincident with the publication of DSM-III in , I presented some preliminary findings on efforts to provide researchers with an operational definition of psychopathy in offender populations Hare During the next decade those early efforts evolved into the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised PCL-R Hare , a item construct rating scale that uses a semi-structured interview, case-history information and specific diagnostic criteria for each item to provide a reliable and valid estimate of the degree to which an offender or forensic psychiatric patient matches the traditional prototypical conception of the psychopath Fulero; Stone.

Each item is scored on a 3-point scale 0, 1, 2 according to the extent to which it applies to the individual. The total score can range from 0 to 40, with between 15 percent and 20 percent of offenders receiving a score of at least 30, the cutoff for a research diagnosis of psychopathy. To put this into context, the mean scores for offenders in general and for noncriminals typically are around 22 and 5, respectively.

A item version of the PCL-R was developed for use in the MacArthur Foundation study on the prediction of violence in the mentally disordered Hart and others Published in as the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version PCL:SV by Hart and colleagues, it is highly correlated with the PCL-R and is used both to screen for psychopathy in forensic populations and as a stand-alone instrument for the assessment of psychopathy in noncriminal populations.

The items fall into two clusters: One cluster, referred to as Factor 1, reflects core interpersonal and affective characteristics; the other cluster, Factor 2, consists of items that reflect a socially deviant and nomadic lifestyle. The similarity between these factors and the behaviors and characteristics described above in the FBI report are obvious. Most psychopaths with the exception of those who somehow manage to plow their way through life without coming into formal or prolonged contact with the criminal justice system meet the criteria for ASPD, but most individuals with ASPD are not psychopaths.

Further, ASPD is very common in criminal populations, and those with the disorder are heterogeneous with respect to personality, attitudes and motivations for engaging in criminal behavior.

As a result, a diagnosis of ASPD has limited utility for making differential predictions of institutional adjustment, response to treatment, and behavior following release from prison.

In contrast, a high PCL-R score depends as much on inferred personality traits as on antisocial behaviors, andwhen used alone or in conjunction with other variableshas considerable predictive validity with respect to treatment outcome, institutional adjustment, recidivism and violence Hare ; Harris and others; Hart and Hare, in press. For example, several studies have found that psychopathic offenders or forensic psychiatric patients as defined by the PCL-R are as much as three or four times more likely to violently reoffend following release from custody than are nonpsychopathic offenders or patients.

ASPD, on the other hand, has relatively little predictive power, at least with forensic populations Hart and Hare, in press. It might be argued that a diagnosis of ASPD is useful in civil psychiatric settings, particularly as a general risk factor for substance abuse Leal and others. Even here, however, psychopathy may be more important than ASPD in understanding substance abuse Alterman and colleagues; Cacciola and others.

The differences between psychopathy and ASPD are further highlighted by recent laboratory research involving the processing and use of linguistic and emotional information. Psychopaths differ dramatically from nonpsychopaths in their performance of a variety of cognitive and affective tasks. Compared with normal individuals, for example, psychopaths are less able to process or use the deep semantic meanings of language and to appreciate the emotional significance of events or experiences Larbig and others; Patrick; Williamson and others.

It is worth noting that it is the interpersonal and affective components of psychopathy as measured by PCL-R, Factor 1 that are most discriminating in these experiments. In sharp contrast, those with a diagnosis of ASPD in which interpersonal and affective traits play little role differ little from those without ASPD in their processing of linguistic and emotional material. A stated goal of the trial Widiger and others was to improve coverage of the traditional symptoms of psychopathy.

Many researchers and clinicians hoped that the field trial would bring the diagnosis of ASPD back on track, but it did so in only a limited sense Hare and Hart The field trial clearly indicated that most of the personality traits that reflect the traditional symptoms of psychopathy were just as reliable as those of the more behaviorally specific DSM-III-R items Widiger and colleagues.

Yet this did not happen, partly because, it was argued, the average clinician would not use the carefully structured approach to the assessment of personality traits used in the field trial. It may come as a surprise to most clinicians that the criteria adopted for DSM-IV were not actually evaluated in the field trial.

The seven-item set listed in DSM-IV was derived from the item set; this derivation was logical rather than empirical. Things become even more problematic when we consider that the DSM-IV text description of ASPD which it says is also known as psychopathy contains many references to traditional features of psychopathy. But in many respects the text account is incongruent with the formal diagnostic criteria. Further, the "Associated Features" section of the text contains this statement, and I paraphrase: Lack of empathy, inflated and arrogant self-appraisal, and glib, superficial charm are features of ASPD that may be particularly useful in prison or forensic settings wherein criminal, delinquent and aggressive acts will be less specific to the disorder.

The words used to describe these and related affective and interpersonal features are those typically associated with psychopathy and were based heavily on the item psychopathic personality disorder set derived from the PCL-R. It is difficult not to conclude that DSM-IV contains two sets of diagnostic criteria for ASPD, one consisting of antisocial and criminal behaviors, and the other consisting of these behaviors plus clinical inferences about personality.

The clinician is not provided with guidelines on how to make these inferences. The first clinician uses only the formal diagnostic criteria whereas the second clinician agrees that the defendant meets the formal criteria but argues that he or she does not have the personality traits described in the "Associated Features" section of the DSM-IV text.

The failure to differentiate between psychopathy and ASPD can have serious consequences for clinicians and for society. For example, most jurisdictions consider psychopathy to be an aggravating rather than a mitigating factor in determining criminal responsibility. In some states an offender convicted of first-degree murder and diagnosed as a psychopath is likely to receive the death penalty on the grounds that psychopaths are cold-blooded, remorseless, untreatable and almost certain to reoffend.

We dont know how many of these inhabitants of death row actually exhibit the personality structure of the psychopath, or how many merely meet the criteria for ASPD, a disorder that applies to the majority of criminals and that has only tenuous implications for treatability and the likelihood of violent reoffending.

If a diagnosis of psychopathy has consequences for the death penalty- or for any other severe disposition, such as an indeterminate sentence or a civil commitment- clinicians making the diagnosis should make certain they do not confuse ASPD with psychopathy.

Instead, the failure to explicitly bring personality back into the diagnosis of ASPD means that the disorder is ambiguous and continues to lack congruence with traditional conceptions of psychopathy.

Perhaps this situation- an unfortunate and unnecessary one in my view- will be rectified in DSM-V. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that interpersonal and affective traits are more discriminating of the construct of psychopathy than are the socially deviant behaviors reflected in the DSM-IV criteria for ASPD Cooke.

Diagnostic confusion about the two disorders has the potential for harming psychiatric patients and society as well. In my book, Without Conscience , I argued that we live in a "camouflage society," a society in which some psychopathic traits- egocentricity, lack of concern for others, superficiality, style over substance, being "cool," manipulativeness, and so forth- increasingly are tolerated and even valued.

With respect to the topic of this article, it is easy to see how both psychopaths and those with ASPD could blend in readily with groups holding antisocial or criminal values. It is more difficult to envisage how those with ASPD could hide out among more prosocial segments of society. Yet psychopaths have little difficulty infiltrating the domains of business, politics, law enforcement, government, academia and other social structures Babiak.

It is the egocentric, cold-blooded and remorseless psychopaths who blend into all aspects of society and have such devastating impacts on people around them who send chills down the spines of law enforcement officers. Reliability of the Revised Psychopathy Checklist in substance abuse patients.

Babiak P. Personality and Individual Differences, 9 , — Dodge, K. Biased decision-making process in aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90 , — Drake, R.

American Journal of Psychiatry, , — Dubro, A. An external validity study of the MMPI personality disorder scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45 , — E, Wetzler, S. Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, — Dumas, J. Ellis, L. Relationships of criminality and psychopathy with eight other apparent behavioral manifestations of sub—optimal arousal.

Personality and Individual Differences, 8 , — Ellis, P L. Empathy: A factor in antisocial behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10 , — Eysenck, H. Crime and personality. London: Methuen. Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum. Psychopathy, personality, and genetics. Fairweather, G.

The effect of selective incentive conditions on the performance of psychopathic, neurotic, and normal criminals in a serial rote learning situation.

Dissertation Abstracts International, 14 , — University Microfilms No. Farley, F. Stimulus-seeking motivation and delinquent behavior among institutionalized delinquent girls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39 , 94— Farrington, D.

The Cambridge study in delinquent development: A long-term follow-up of London males. Kaiser Eds. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Fishbein, D. New diagnostic methods in criminology: Assessing organic sources of behavioral disorders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23 , — Fooks, G. Differential qualitative performance of delinquents on the Porteus Maze. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21 , — Ford, M. Sex bias in the diagnosis of histrionic and antisocial personality disorders.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57 , — Forth, A. The contingent negative variation in psychopaths. Psychophysiology, 26 , — Fowles, D. Psychophysiology, 17 , 87— Biological variables in psychopathology. Sutker Eds. Fox, R. Spontaneous GSR and anxiety level in sociopathic delinquents. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27 , Gerstley, L. Ability to form an alliance with the therapist: A possible marker of prognosis for patients with antisocial personality disorder.

Gilberstadt, H. A handbook for clinical and actuarial MMPI interpretation. Philadelphia: Saunders. Goodwin, D. Psychiatric diagnosis 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Gorenstein, E. Frontal lobe functions in psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91 , — Cognitive-perceptual deficit in an alcoholism spectrum disorder.

Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48 , — Disinhibitory psy—chopathology: A new perspective and a model for research. Psychological Review, 87 , — Gough, H.

A sociological theory of psychopathology. American Journal of Sociology, 53 , — Theory and measurement of socialization. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24 , 23— Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. The identification and measurement of predispositional factors in crime and delinquency.

Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16 , — Graham, J. MMPI Assessing personality and psychopathology. Grande, T. P, Wolf, A. Associations among alcoholism, drug abuse, and antisocial personality: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 55 , — Gray, J. Elements of a two-process theory of learning. New York: Academic Press. A whole and its parts: Behavior, the brain, cognition and emotion.

Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 3 , 99— Green, B. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, , — Gullick, E. Delay of information in paired-associate learning among incarcerated groups of sociopaths and heroin addicts. Psychological Reports, 38 , — Hammen, C.

Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86 , — Hare, R. Acquisition and generalization of a conditioned-fear response in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic criminals. Journal of Psychology , 59, — Psychopathy: Theory and research.

Electrodermal and cardiovascular correlates of psychopathy. Psychopathy and laterality of cerebral function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88 , — The assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1 , — Psychopathy and physiological activity during anticipation of an aversive stimulus in a distraction paradigm. Psychophysiology, 19 , — Diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder in two prison populations.

Performance of psychopaths on cognitive tasks related to frontal lobe function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93 , — Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53 , 7— The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised.

Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. Psychopathy and physiological activity in a mixed-motive game situation. Psychophysiology, 11 , — Psychopathy and physiological responses to threat of aversive stimulus. Psychophysiology, 15 , — The Revised Psychopathy Checklist: Reliability and factor structure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, , — Psychopathy and cerebral asymmetry in semantic processing. Psychopathy and autonomic conditioning.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 79 , — Harlow, H. F, Harlow, M. Learning motivated by a manipulation drive. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40 , — Harpur, T. Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 , — Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications.

Hart, S. Performance of criminal psychopaths on selected neuropsychological tests. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99 , — Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison. Heilbrun, A. Psychopathy and violent crime. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47 , — Cognitive models of criminal violence based upon intelligence and psychopathy levels. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 , — Psychological Reports, 62 , 37— Psychopathy and dangerousness: Comparison, integration, and extension of two psychopathic typologies.

British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24 , — Helzer, J. The co-occurrence of alcoholism with other psychiatric disorders in the general population and its impact on treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 49 , — Hesselbrock, M. Psychopathology in hospitalized alcoholics. Holzman, P. Recent studies of psychophysiology in schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13 , 49— Hundleby, J. Using other behaviors in the study of adolescent drug usage. Schlegel Chair , Social psychological aspects of nonmedical drug use. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Hutchings, B. Registered criminality in the adoptive and biological parents of registered male criminal adoptees. Fieve, D. Brill Eds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Hyler, S.

W, Spitzer, R. Iacono, W. Psychophysiology and genetics: A key to psychopathology research. Psychophysiology, 20 , — Johns, J. The effect of social reward on verbal conditioning in psychopathic and neurotic military offenders. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26 , — Jordan, B.

Antisocial and related disorders in a Southern community: An application of grade of membership analysis. Jutai, J. Psychopathy and selective attention during performance of a complex perceptual-motor task. E Psychopathy and event-related potentials ERPs associated with attention to speech stimuli.

Kadlub, K. The effects of two types of reinforcements on the performance of psychopathic and normal criminals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois. Kammeier, M. Personality characteristics of alcoholics as college freshmen and at time of treatment.

Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 34 , — Kandel, E. Frontal-lobe dysfunction and antisocial behavior: A review. IQ as a protective factor for subjects at high risk for antisocial behavior.

Kaplan, M. American Psychologist, 38 , — Karpman, B. Myth of psychopathic personality. Kass, F. Kass, E, Spitzer, R. Kazdin, A. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and relationship therapy in the treatment of children referred for antisocial behavior. Keane, T. Comorbidity in post-traumatic stress disorder: An analysis of community and clinical studies.

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20 , — Kellner, R. Personality disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 46 , 58— Kilpatrick, D. Personality correlates of polydrug use. Klein, M. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Koch, J. Ravensburg, Germany: Maier. Koenigsberg, H. Kosson, D. P Evaluating the construct validity of psychopathy in black and white male inmates: Three preliminary studied Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99 , — Kosten, T.

Comprehensive Psychiatry, 23 , — Kraepelin, E. Clinical psychiatry: A textbook for students and physicians [Abstracted and adapted by A. Diefendorf from the 7th German edition of Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie]. Lee, M. Interrelations of empathy, cognition, and moral reasoning with dimensions of juvenile delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16 , — Lewis, C. Diagnostic interactions: Alcoholism and antisocial personality.

Association of alcoholism with antisocial personality in urban men. Lewis, D. Lilienfeld, S. The relationship of histrionic personality disorder to antisocial personality and somatization disorders. Loeber, R. Early predictors of male delinquency. Psychological Bulletin, 94 , 68— Quay Ed. Loranger, A. W, Susman, V. The Personality Disorder Examination: A preliminary report.

Journal of Personality Disorders, 1 , 1— Lykken, D. A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55 , 6— The psychopath and the lie detector.

Psychopathic personality. Corsini Ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience. McCollough, J. Anxiety, learning sets, and sociopathy. Psychological Reports, 27 , 47— McCord, W.

The psychopath. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. McKinley, J. Hysteria, hypomania, and psychopathic deviate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28 , — MacMillan, J.

Sociobiology and antisocial personality: An alternative perspective. Maher, B. Principles of psychopathology. New York: McGraw-Hill. Malatesta, V. Sensation seeking and chronic public drunkenness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 , — Malow, R. Personality disorders classification and symptoms in cocaine and opioid addicts.

Marks, R A. The actuarial use of the MMPI with adolescents and children. Mawson, A. Personality and arousal: New interpretation of the psychophysiological literature.

Biological Psychiatry, 12 , 49— Mednick, S. A biosocial theory of the learning of lawabiding behavior. Genetic factors in criminal behavior: Evidence from an adoption cohort. Science, , — Megargee, E. The California Psychological Inventory handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Millon, T. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual 3rd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems. Moffitt, T. Parental mental disorder and offspring criminal behavior: An adoption study. Psychiatry , 50 , — Morey, L.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97 , — Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44 , 47— Journal of Personality Disorders, 3 , — Waugh, M. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 , — Morrison, J. A family study of the hyperactive child syndrome.

Biological Psychiatry, 3 , — Nasby, W. Attributional bias among boys to interpret unambiguous social stimuli as displays of hostility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89 , — Newman, J. Passive avoidance learning in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95 , — P, Patterson, C. Passive avoidance in psychopaths: The effects of reward.

Personality and Individual Differences, 11 , — Response perseveration in psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96 , — Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, — Olweus, D. Antisocial behaviour in the school setting. Orris, J. Visual monitoring performance in three subgroups of male delinquents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74 , — Overall, J. MMPI personality patterns of alcoholics and narcotic addicts. Painting, D. The performance of psychopathic individuals under conditions of positive and negative partial reinforcement.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 62 , — Partridge, G. Current conceptions of psychopathic personality: I. Peterson, D. Personality and background factors in juvenile delinquency as inferred from questionnaire responses.

Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23 , — Personality factors related to juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 32 , — Pfohl, B. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 27 , 21— Pinel, P. A treatise on insanity D. Davis, Trans. Original work published in Google Scholar. Pollock, V. Childhood antecedents of antisocial behavior: Parental alcoholism and physical abusive—ness.

Pontius, A. Basis for a neurological test of frontal lobe function in adolescents. Adolescence, 9 , — F Frontal lobe system maturational lag in juvenile delinquents shown in the Narratives Test.

Adolescence, 11 , — Frontal lobe system dysfunction in some criminal actions as shown in the Narratives Test. Pope, H. The validity of DSM-III borderline personality disorder: A phenomenologic, family history, treatment response, and long-term follow-up study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40 , 23— Prichard, J.

A treatise on insanity. Quay, H. Personality dimensions in delinquent males as inferred from the factor analysis of behavior ratings. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1 , 33— Psychopathic personality as pathological stimulation-seeking.

Psychopathy, neuroticism, and verbal conditioning: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29 , The differential behavioral classification of the juvenile offender. Department of Justice. Raine, A. Reduced lateralization in verbal dichotic listening in adolescent psychopaths. Contingent negative variation, P3 evoked potentials, and antisocial behaviour. Psychophysiology, 24 , — Enhanced P3 evoked potentials and longer P3 recovery time in psychopaths.

Psychophysiology, 25 , 30— Autonomic orienting responses in year-old male subjects and criminal behavior at age Relationships between central and autonomic measures of arousal at age 15 and criminality at age 24 years.

Archives of General Psychiatry, 47 , —